Unnoticed Effects of Inspection Errors and a Quality Paradox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


A central element of quality assurance is inspections. Inspections, however, are imperfect and prone to errors. Devastating effects of inspection error type I — rejection of conforming items, are considered in this note. When several inspections are performed along a serial process, the number of falsely rejected items is similar in magnitude to (or even larger than) the number of defective items. Moreover, to compensate for this loss, more units should enter the process and consequently, more units turn defective. The quality community seems to be unaware of these effects, certainly of the last one, despite their practical significance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2995-2997
Number of pages3
JournalQuality and Reliability Engineering International
Issue number8
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2016


  • inspection errors
  • quality costs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Management Science and Operations Research


Dive into the research topics of 'Unnoticed Effects of Inspection Errors and a Quality Paradox'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this