TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of contact-free sleep monitoring device with comparison to polysomnography
AU - Tal, Asher
AU - Shinar, Zvika
AU - Shaki, David
AU - Codish, Shlomi
AU - Goldbart, Aviv
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by funding from EarlySense, Ltd. Dr. Shinar is an employee of EarlySense, the company that developed the technology used in this study. Dr. Tal has participated in the speakers' bureau of Sanofi and Teva. Dr. Goldbart has recieved research support from the Israel Science Foundation (ISF grant 1344/15). The other authors have indicated no financial conflicts of interest. Ethics Statement: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Ethics Committee of Soroka Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheba, Israel (IRB Approval Reference Number: 0231-13-SOR; 24 Oct 2013). All records and information were anonymized and de-identified for analysis and publication. All subjects signed consent forms.
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - Study Objectives: To validate a contact-free system designed to achieve maximal comfort during long-term sleep monitoring, together with high monitoring accuracy. Methods: We used a contact-free monitoring system (EarlySense, Ltd., Israel), comprising an under-the-mattress piezoelectric sensor and a smartphone application, to collect vital signs and analyze sleep. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), body movement, and calculated sleep-related parameters from the EarlySense (ES) sensor were compared to data simultaneously generated by the gold standard, polysomnography (PSG). Subjects in the sleep laboratory underwent overnight technician-attended full PSG, whereas subjects at home were recorded for 1 to 3 nights with portable partial PSG devices. Data were compared epoch by epoch. Results: A total of 63 subjects (85 nights) were recorded under a variety of sleep conditions. Compared to PSG, the contact-free system showed similar values for average total sleep time (TST), % wake, % rapid eye movement, and % non-rapid eye movement sleep, with 96.1% and 93.3% accuracy of continuous measurement of HR and RR, respectively. We found a linear correlation between TST measured by the sensor and TST determined by PSG, with a coefficient of 0.98 (R = 0.87). Epoch-by-epoch comparison with PSG in the sleep laboratory setting revealed that the system showed sleep detection sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 92.5%, 80.4%, and 90.5%, respectively. Conclusions: TST estimates with the contact-free sleep monitoring system were closely correlated with the gold-standard reference. This system shows good sleep staging capability with improved performance over accelerometer-based apps, and collects additional physiological information on heart rate and respiratory rate.
AB - Study Objectives: To validate a contact-free system designed to achieve maximal comfort during long-term sleep monitoring, together with high monitoring accuracy. Methods: We used a contact-free monitoring system (EarlySense, Ltd., Israel), comprising an under-the-mattress piezoelectric sensor and a smartphone application, to collect vital signs and analyze sleep. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), body movement, and calculated sleep-related parameters from the EarlySense (ES) sensor were compared to data simultaneously generated by the gold standard, polysomnography (PSG). Subjects in the sleep laboratory underwent overnight technician-attended full PSG, whereas subjects at home were recorded for 1 to 3 nights with portable partial PSG devices. Data were compared epoch by epoch. Results: A total of 63 subjects (85 nights) were recorded under a variety of sleep conditions. Compared to PSG, the contact-free system showed similar values for average total sleep time (TST), % wake, % rapid eye movement, and % non-rapid eye movement sleep, with 96.1% and 93.3% accuracy of continuous measurement of HR and RR, respectively. We found a linear correlation between TST measured by the sensor and TST determined by PSG, with a coefficient of 0.98 (R = 0.87). Epoch-by-epoch comparison with PSG in the sleep laboratory setting revealed that the system showed sleep detection sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 92.5%, 80.4%, and 90.5%, respectively. Conclusions: TST estimates with the contact-free sleep monitoring system were closely correlated with the gold-standard reference. This system shows good sleep staging capability with improved performance over accelerometer-based apps, and collects additional physiological information on heart rate and respiratory rate.
KW - Actigraphy
KW - Home sleep monitoring
KW - Polysomnography
KW - Sleep architecture
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016056615&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5664/jcsm.6514
DO - 10.5664/jcsm.6514
M3 - Article
C2 - 27998378
AN - SCOPUS:85016056615
VL - 13
SP - 517
EP - 522
JO - Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
JF - Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
SN - 1550-9389
IS - 3
ER -