Abstract
In a European study of fish death in mixing zones of rivers with different acidities a reliable determination of Al and other elements in gills from freshwater fish was required, and both INAA and ICP-MS were studied as candidate reference methods. INAA requires minimum sample handling with a correspondingly small risk of contamination and no blank value; however, a careful study was needed of both nuclear interference from P and the increased detection limit caused by other major elements in the sample, before reliable results for Al could be ascertained. ICP-MS requires dissolution of the sample with a resulting risk of contamination and a significant reagent blank; while sensitivity was good, the interference from N created problems for sample decomposition in the microwave oven. Our experience with actual samples indicates that both methods suffer from considerable contamination problems, requiring that samples be handled in a clean bench with superpure reagents. Nuclear interference was determined experimentally by irradiating stoichiometric P-compounds with and without a Cd-shield; the observed interference of 1 μg Al from 50 mg of P was found to require no correction in almost all cases. The accuracy of results was ascertained by analyzing SRM 1577 Bovine Liver.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 321-329 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry |
| Volume | 192 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 May 1995 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Analytical Chemistry
- Nuclear Energy and Engineering
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
- Pollution
- Spectroscopy
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of methods for the determination of aluminium in fish gills by INAA and ICP-MS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver