TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of OMI satellite erythemal daily dose retrievals using ground-based measurements from fourteen stations
AU - Mateos, D.
AU - Bilbao, J.
AU - Kudish, A. I.
AU - Parisi, A. V.
AU - Carbajal, G.
AU - di Sarra, A.
AU - Román, R.
AU - de Miguel, A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support extended by the Spanish Government under the projects CGL2010-12140E and CGL2011-25363 . The Dead Sea and Arava Science Centre has funded and provided on-going support for the two Israeli meteorological stations monitoring the UVB radiation. Measurements at Trisaia site were supported by the Italian Ministry for Environment through the MINNI Project. The authors gratefully thank the OMI International Science Team for the satellite data used in this study. Analyses and visualizations used in this paper were produced with the Giovanni online data system, developed and maintained by the NASA GES DISC. We also acknowledge the MODIS mission scientists and associated NASA personnel for the production of the data used in this research effort. D. Mateos and R. Román would also like to thank the University of Valladolid for the Ph.D. financial support by the PIF-UVa grants.
PY - 2013/1/21
Y1 - 2013/1/21
N2 - The satellite Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) erythemal daily dose (EDD) product is validated through an inter-comparison with ground-based measurements at 14 ground-based stations distributed worldwide between 43°N and 64°S in 5 different countries of both hemispheres: Argentina, Australia, Italy, Israel, and Spain. The results show that OMI data overestimate ground-based EDD measurements except in stations with high surface albedo (e.g., covered by snow), in agreement with the results reported by previous studies. The average differences between satellite and ground-based data reached a maximum of ~. 25% for all-sky cases. When cloudless conditions are selected, removing intra-daily changes in cloudiness, the agreement improves; although average differences between 10 and 20% still appear for seven low-albedo stations. The influences of ozone and aerosol on the observed differences show opposite trends: viz., high ozone column values result in a decrease whereas high turbidity conditions produce an increase in the differences. A correction factor based on the aerosol absorbing optical thickness was applied to correct for this effect, which is not considered in the OMI algorithm. After applying this correction, the agreement between OMI and ground-based EDD measurements improves and the difference between them falls below 20% for more than 90% of the cases at 8 stations. A dependence on station altitude is also noted for both all-sky and clear-sky cases.
AB - The satellite Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) erythemal daily dose (EDD) product is validated through an inter-comparison with ground-based measurements at 14 ground-based stations distributed worldwide between 43°N and 64°S in 5 different countries of both hemispheres: Argentina, Australia, Italy, Israel, and Spain. The results show that OMI data overestimate ground-based EDD measurements except in stations with high surface albedo (e.g., covered by snow), in agreement with the results reported by previous studies. The average differences between satellite and ground-based data reached a maximum of ~. 25% for all-sky cases. When cloudless conditions are selected, removing intra-daily changes in cloudiness, the agreement improves; although average differences between 10 and 20% still appear for seven low-albedo stations. The influences of ozone and aerosol on the observed differences show opposite trends: viz., high ozone column values result in a decrease whereas high turbidity conditions produce an increase in the differences. A correction factor based on the aerosol absorbing optical thickness was applied to correct for this effect, which is not considered in the OMI algorithm. After applying this correction, the agreement between OMI and ground-based EDD measurements improves and the difference between them falls below 20% for more than 90% of the cases at 8 stations. A dependence on station altitude is also noted for both all-sky and clear-sky cases.
KW - Absorbing aerosol correction
KW - Effects of ozone and aerosol
KW - Erythemally-weighted ultraviolet radiation
KW - Satellite data
KW - Solar radiation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867641600&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.rse.2012.09.015
DO - 10.1016/j.rse.2012.09.015
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84867641600
SN - 0034-4257
VL - 128
SP - 1
EP - 10
JO - Remote Sensing of Environment
JF - Remote Sensing of Environment
ER -