Variation in food availability influences prey-capture method in antlion larvae

1. Larvae of a Myrmecaelurus sp. are unique among antlions because they have two prey-capture methods; they either ambush prey at the surface, or dig pit traps that prey fall in to. It was hypothesised that larvae will use the capture method that maximises their net rate of energy gain, which will be influenced by food availability (encounter rate) and by past energy inputs (body condition). 2. Costs were estimated by measuring resting and activity metabolic rates and determining the duration of pit maintenance at various encounter rates with ants that served as prey. Benefits were estimated from the energy gained per ant captured at different encounter rates. 3. Net energy gained was higher with a pit than without one, and was influenced more by the differences in prey capture rate between the two capture methods, and less by the differences in energy costs associated with each method. The proportion of larvae that constructed pits was higher when they were in intermediate body condition than when in good or in poor body condition. 4. Thus, the use of one capture method or the other depends on a combination of the influences of past net energy gain and the antlion's most recent change in encounter rate with prey. Ambushing without a pit may serve as a default when physiological constraints limit the larvae's ability to invest in pit construction and maintenance, or when larvae are sated, and saving the energy of pit construction and maintenance is worthwhile.