TY - JOUR
T1 - Visual detection is gated by attending for action
T2 - Evidence from hemispatial neglect
AU - Rafal, Robert
AU - Danziger, Shai
AU - Grossi, Giordana
AU - Machado, Liana
AU - Ward, Robert
PY - 2002/12/10
Y1 - 2002/12/10
N2 - We report observations in patients with visual extinction demonstrating that detection of visual events is gated by attention at the level of processing at which a stimulus is selected for action. In one experiment, three patients reported the identity of numerical words and digits presented either in the ipsilesional field, the contralesional field, or both fields. On the critical bilateral trials, extinction was greater when the competing items shared the same meaning and response, regardless of whether the items were visually different (e.g., ONE + 1), or identical (e.g., 1 + 1). A fourth patient was tested in a second experiment in which the competing items on bilateral trials were either different (e.g., ONE + TWO), identical (e.g., ONE + ONE) or homophones that were visually and semantically different but shared the same response (e.g., ONE + WON). Homophones and identical items caused similar extinction with less extinction occurring on different item trials.
AB - We report observations in patients with visual extinction demonstrating that detection of visual events is gated by attention at the level of processing at which a stimulus is selected for action. In one experiment, three patients reported the identity of numerical words and digits presented either in the ipsilesional field, the contralesional field, or both fields. On the critical bilateral trials, extinction was greater when the competing items shared the same meaning and response, regardless of whether the items were visually different (e.g., ONE + 1), or identical (e.g., 1 + 1). A fourth patient was tested in a second experiment in which the competing items on bilateral trials were either different (e.g., ONE + TWO), identical (e.g., ONE + ONE) or homophones that were visually and semantically different but shared the same response (e.g., ONE + WON). Homophones and identical items caused similar extinction with less extinction occurring on different item trials.
KW - Attention
KW - Consciousness
KW - Extinction
KW - Response selection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18744400487&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1073/pnas.252309099
DO - 10.1073/pnas.252309099
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:18744400487
SN - 0027-8424
VL - 99
SP - 16371
EP - 16375
JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IS - 25
ER -