Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

WAS ULAM RIGHT? III: INDECOMPOSABLE IDEALS

  • Tanmay Inamdar
  • , Assaf Rinot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We continue our study of Ulam’s measure problem. In contrast to our previous works, we shift our focus from measures stratified by their additivity, to measures stratified by their indecomposability. The breakthrough here is obtained by replacing the classical ‘least’ function associated with ideals by a two-dimensional ‘last’ function associated with walks on ordinals. Consequently, we obtain conditions under which a measure admits not just infinite pairwise disjoint families of positive sets, but in fact families of maximum possible size. As an application we solve a problem left open in Shelah’s Cardinal Arithmetic book, proving that for every weakly inaccessible cardinal κ, if there exists a stationary subset of κ that does not reflect at regulars, then the strong Ramsey relation κ → [κ]2κ holds.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1617-1649
Number of pages33
JournalJournal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2026

Keywords

  • C-sequences
  • partition relations
  • saturated ideals
  • Sierpinski’s onto mapping
  • Ulam matrix

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Mathematics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'WAS ULAM RIGHT? III: INDECOMPOSABLE IDEALS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this