TY - GEN
T1 - Weighted Microscopic Image Reconstruction
AU - Bar-Noy, Amotz
AU - Böhnlein, Toni
AU - Lotker, Zvi
AU - Peleg, David
AU - Rawitz, Dror
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2021/1/1
Y1 - 2021/1/1
N2 - Assume that we inspect a specimen represented as a collection of points. The points are typically organized on a grid structure in 2D- or 3D-space, and each point has an associated physical value. The goal of the inspection is to determine these values. Yet, measuring these values directly (by surgical probes) may damage the specimen or is simply impossible. The alternative is to employ aggregate measuring techniques (e.g., CT or MRI), whereby measurements are taken over subsets of points, and the exact values at each point are subsequently extracted by computational methods. In the Minimum Surgical Probing problem (MSP) the inspected specimen is represented by a graph G and a vector ℓ∈ Rn that assigns a value ℓi to each vertex i. An aggregate measurement (called probe) centered at vertex i captures its entire neighborhood, i.e., the outcome of a probe centered at i is Pi= ∑ j∈N(i)∪{i}ℓj where N(i) is the open neighborhood of vertex i. Bar-Noy et al. [4] gave a criterion whether the vector ℓ can be recovered from the collection of probes P={Pv|v∈V(G)} alone. However, there are graphs where P is inconclusive, i.e., there are several vectors ℓ that are consistent with P. In these cases, we are allowed to use surgical probes. A surgical probe at vertex i returns ℓi. The objective of MSP is to recover ℓ from P and G using as few surgical probes as possible. In this work, we introduce the Weighted Minimum Surgical Probing (WMSP) problem in which a vertex i may have an aggregation coefficient wi, namely Pi= ∑ j∈N(i)ℓj+ wiℓi. We show that WMSP can be solved in polynomial time. Moreover, we analyze the number of required surgical probes depending on the weight vector w. For any graph, we give two boundaries outside of which no surgical probes are needed to recover the vector ℓ. The boundaries are connected to the (Signless) Laplacian matrix. In addition, we focus on the special case, where. We explore the range of possible behaviors of WMSP by determining the number of surgical probes necessary in certain graph families, such as trees and various grid graphs. Finally, we analyze higher dimensional grids graphs. For the hypercube, when, we only need surgical probes if the dimension is odd, and when, we only need surgical probes if the dimension is even. The number of surgical probes follows the binomial coefficients.
AB - Assume that we inspect a specimen represented as a collection of points. The points are typically organized on a grid structure in 2D- or 3D-space, and each point has an associated physical value. The goal of the inspection is to determine these values. Yet, measuring these values directly (by surgical probes) may damage the specimen or is simply impossible. The alternative is to employ aggregate measuring techniques (e.g., CT or MRI), whereby measurements are taken over subsets of points, and the exact values at each point are subsequently extracted by computational methods. In the Minimum Surgical Probing problem (MSP) the inspected specimen is represented by a graph G and a vector ℓ∈ Rn that assigns a value ℓi to each vertex i. An aggregate measurement (called probe) centered at vertex i captures its entire neighborhood, i.e., the outcome of a probe centered at i is Pi= ∑ j∈N(i)∪{i}ℓj where N(i) is the open neighborhood of vertex i. Bar-Noy et al. [4] gave a criterion whether the vector ℓ can be recovered from the collection of probes P={Pv|v∈V(G)} alone. However, there are graphs where P is inconclusive, i.e., there are several vectors ℓ that are consistent with P. In these cases, we are allowed to use surgical probes. A surgical probe at vertex i returns ℓi. The objective of MSP is to recover ℓ from P and G using as few surgical probes as possible. In this work, we introduce the Weighted Minimum Surgical Probing (WMSP) problem in which a vertex i may have an aggregation coefficient wi, namely Pi= ∑ j∈N(i)ℓj+ wiℓi. We show that WMSP can be solved in polynomial time. Moreover, we analyze the number of required surgical probes depending on the weight vector w. For any graph, we give two boundaries outside of which no surgical probes are needed to recover the vector ℓ. The boundaries are connected to the (Signless) Laplacian matrix. In addition, we focus on the special case, where. We explore the range of possible behaviors of WMSP by determining the number of surgical probes necessary in certain graph families, such as trees and various grid graphs. Finally, we analyze higher dimensional grids graphs. For the hypercube, when, we only need surgical probes if the dimension is odd, and when, we only need surgical probes if the dimension is even. The number of surgical probes follows the binomial coefficients.
KW - Graph realization
KW - Graph spectra
KW - Graph theory
KW - Grid graphs
KW - Image reconstruction
KW - Realization algorithm
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101579662&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-67731-2_27
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-67731-2_27
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85101579662
SN - 9783030677305
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
SP - 373
EP - 386
BT - SOFSEM 2021
A2 - Bureš, Tomáš
A2 - Dondi, Riccardo
A2 - Gamper, Johann
A2 - Guerrini, Giovanna
A2 - Jurdzinski, Tomasz
A2 - Pahl, Claus
A2 - Sikora, Florian
A2 - Wong, Prudence W.
PB - Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
T2 - 47th International Conference on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Computer Science, SOFSEM 2021
Y2 - 25 January 2021 through 29 January 2021
ER -