Abstract
This essay analyzes the impact of Israeli unilateralism-specifically that of its settlement project-on the two-state solution. After exploring the relationship between unilateralism and power, the authors show, inter alia, that in-migration has accounted for about half the settlement growth since the international embrace of the land-forpeace formula in 1991, that the level of in-migration does not fluctuate according to government composition (right or left), and that Israeli-Palestinian negotiations have spurred rather than inhibited settlement expansion. The essay is framed by a contrast with the Palestinian bid for full UN membership, rejected as unilateralism by the Western powers but in fact aimed at undercutting Israeli unilateralism and creating the conditions for meaningful negotiations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 6-18 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Journal of Palestine Studies |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Mar 2012 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Sociology and Political Science