Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

When ‘blind’ selection works—and when it doesn't

  • Hagai Rabinovitch

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Efforts to reduce bias in selection often rely on blindfolding—concealing job-irrelevant factors such as race or gender. While this approach can reduce bias, it may also obscure and preserve it when selection tools are themselves biased. This paper introduces a novel framework showing when revealing sensitive information enables more accurate and fair decisions. By leveraging hidden correlations between potentially biasing factors and test scores, decision-makers can correct for bias and improve selection decisions. The framework offers guidance for policymakers and institutions. It also highlights resistance to revealing such information, rooted in the desire to preserve a positive social image. This tension between perceived and actual fairness helps explain reluctance to adjust biased tools.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102195
JournalCurrent Opinion in Psychology
Volume67
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Feb 2026
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When ‘blind’ selection works—and when it doesn't'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this