Abstract
Despite recent increased interest in self-conscious emotions, few studies have investigated their regulation. The current research examines the effectiveness of self-perspective in regulating negative self-conscious (guilt, shame) versus basic (anger, sadness) emotions. We predict that adopting a distanced perspective on the self would attenuate the experience of anger and sadness, as previous research has shown (e.g., Kross et al., 2005). However, because the experience of self-conscious emotions involves self-evaluation as well as the evaluation of the self from the perspective of others, a self-distanced perspective may enable these emotions and fail to attenuate the experience of shame and guilt. As predicted, a self-distanced perspective attenuated feelings of sadness and anger, but not of shame and guilt. These findings suggest the appraisal of the experienced emotion (i.e., whether it involves self-evaluations and/or the perspective of others) may influence the effectiveness of emotion-regulation strategies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1089-1092 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Journal of Experimental Social Psychology |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Nov 2013 |
Keywords
- Basic emotions
- Emotion regulation
- Self-conscious emotions
- Self-perspective
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'When stepping outside the self is not enough: A self-distanced perspective reduces the experience of basic but not of self-conscious emotions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver