Abstract
Integrating car parking facilities with public transport in Park and Ride (P&R) facilities has the potential to shorten car trips, contributing to more sustainable mobility. There is an ongoing debate about the actual effects of P&R on the transport system at the subregional level. A key issue is the relative attractiveness of city centre car parks (CCCP), P&R and public transport. The paper presents the findings of a comparative empirical case-study based on a field survey of CCCP and P&R users conducted in the city of Bath, UK. Spatial and statistical analyses are applied. Radial distance to parking, availability of P&R sites in the direction of travel, gender, age, income and party-size are found to be important factors in a binary logistic regression model, explaining the revealed-preference of parking type. Stated analysis of foregone parking alternatives suggests more use of public transport and walking/cycling would likely occur without first-best parking alternatives. The policy implications and possible planning alternatives to P&R at the urban fringes for achieving greater sustainability goals are also discussed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 124-133 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Journal of Transport Geography |
Volume | 36 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Jan 2014 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Park and ride
- Parking
- Public transport
- Sustainable mobility
- Transport policy
- Travel behaviour
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Transportation
- General Environmental Science