Why epigenetics is not a vindication of Lamarckism - and why that matters

Ute Deichmann

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

11 Scopus citations

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	80-82
Number of pages	3
Journal	Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Volume	57
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.04.004
State	Published - 1 Jun 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

@article{323fa7d672e54a7dacc52d99244d8e30,

title = "Why epigenetics is not a vindication of Lamarckism - and why that matters",

author = "Ute Deichmann",

year = "2016",

month = jun,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.04.004",

language = "English",

volume = "57",

pages = "80--82",

journal = "Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences",

issn = "1369-8486",

publisher = "Elsevier Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why epigenetics is not a vindication of Lamarckism - and why that matters

AU - Deichmann, Ute

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84964453157

U2 - 10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.04.004

DO - 10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.04.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 27139147

AN - SCOPUS:84964453157

SN - 1369-8486

VL - 57

SP - 80

EP - 82

JO - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences

JF - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences

ER -