Abstract
Leibovich et al. propose that continuous magnitudes and a number sense are used holistically to judge numerosity. We point out that their proposal is incomplete and implausible: incomplete, as it does not explain how continuous magnitudes are calculated; implausible, as it cannot explain performance in estimation tasks. We propose that we do not possess a number sense. Instead, we assume that numerosity judgments are accomplished by weighing the different continuous magnitudes constituting numerosity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | e171 |
| Journal | The Behavioral and brain sciences |
| Volume | 40 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Physiology
- Behavioral Neuroscience
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Why try saving the ANS? An alternative proposal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver