Abstract
Dynamic theories of wisdom emphasise that metacognitive attributes—intellectual humility, open-mindedness, and perspective-taking—evolve through life’s challenges and are crucial for individual and societal well-being. These attributes help mitigate issues like misinformation, polarization, and societal acrimony. Reviewing prominent wisdom models, we highlight context-dependent variations in these attributes, with implications for measurement practices. We posit that the temporal dimension—central to wisdom theories—is neglected or misinterpreted in empirical studies. A systematic literature review demonstrates many conclusions about developing wisdom or its downstream effects are based on cross-sectional, atemporal data. In response, we advocate for greater focus on the temporal bounds of empirical data in social psychology and offer tutorial-style recommendations for formalising narrative theories to explicitly specify one’s level of analysis. Beyond wisdom, we illustrate similar temporal oversights across clinical, social, and cultural domains. Our recommendations offer a generalizable framework to advance dynamic research practices critical for understanding psychological change.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | European Review of Social Psychology |
| DOIs | |
| State | Accepted/In press - 1 Jan 2025 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Wisdom
- ecological fallacy
- formal modelling
- metacognition
- personal change
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology